<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going to have to examine this one further</title>
	<atom:link href="http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/</link>
	<description>Dissecting politics, business and the media in Manitoba</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More on the bitumen thing &#171; PolicyFrog</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the bitumen thing &#171; PolicyFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] for the Edmonton Journal a few weeks back explaining why he thinks Taft&#8217;s bitumen concept [see previous post] won&#8217;t work. He makes a number of good points about labour supply, but this is what stood out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Edmonton Journal a few weeks back explaining why he thinks Taft&#8217;s bitumen concept [see previous post] won&#8217;t work. He makes a number of good points about labour supply, but this is what stood out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherenkov</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>cherenkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard not to be cynical sometimes.  Is Doer opposed to non-union jobs coming to Manitoba?  Is he afraid that considering the idea will tarnish his green image?  Or, does he have a legitimate reason -- something having to so with what&#039;s best for the Province?  If he does, I would certainly like to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard not to be cynical sometimes.  Is Doer opposed to non-union jobs coming to Manitoba?  Is he afraid that considering the idea will tarnish his green image?  Or, does he have a legitimate reason &#8212; something having to so with what&#8217;s best for the Province?  If he does, I would certainly like to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpy old man</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpy old man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/going-to-have-to-examaine-this-one-further/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>While not surprised I am disappointed that our current government remains so anti-business that this opportunity does not warrant so much as a polite &quot;let&#039;s hear what the Albertans have to say&quot;. 

We need more and more high paying jobs in Manitoba. Why not we refine that oil here, and we reship it to the major centres nearest us, such as Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin and other mid-west areas.

We need to be continually developing major critical mass that will ostensibly drive other business to this province. What spin-off benefits could such development bring?

Manitobans are reaping what they&#039;ve sown by electing this g-d government for a third (ruinous) term.

Thank Christ we have those union jobs at the Floodway, Airport, Manitoba Hydro building to keep us in jobs. Did I miss any?

And this is me NOT getting started!

- grumpy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not surprised I am disappointed that our current government remains so anti-business that this opportunity does not warrant so much as a polite &#8220;let&#8217;s hear what the Albertans have to say&#8221;. </p>
<p>We need more and more high paying jobs in Manitoba. Why not we refine that oil here, and we reship it to the major centres nearest us, such as Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin and other mid-west areas.</p>
<p>We need to be continually developing major critical mass that will ostensibly drive other business to this province. What spin-off benefits could such development bring?</p>
<p>Manitobans are reaping what they&#8217;ve sown by electing this g-d government for a third (ruinous) term.</p>
<p>Thank Christ we have those union jobs at the Floodway, Airport, Manitoba Hydro building to keep us in jobs. Did I miss any?</p>
<p>And this is me NOT getting started!</p>
<p>- grumpy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
