<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manitoba Hydro&#8217;s future ad campaign? Not bloody likely.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/manitoba-hydros-future-ad-campaign-not-bloody-likely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/manitoba-hydros-future-ad-campaign-not-bloody-likely/</link>
	<description>Dissecting politics, business and the media in Manitoba</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gaile</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/manitoba-hydros-future-ad-campaign-not-bloody-likely/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/manitoba-hydros-future-ad-campaign-not-bloody-likely/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Scale is always a question, cannot tell from the ad what the width of rail right of way is.

Manitoba Hydro &#039;reserves&#039; for corridors on the east side can be as wide as 2 kilometers. And the discussion about the DC bi pole III is being conducted without an energy plan for the province, without full information as to future corridors which will be required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scale is always a question, cannot tell from the ad what the width of rail right of way is.</p>
<p>Manitoba Hydro &#8216;reserves&#8217; for corridors on the east side can be as wide as 2 kilometers. And the discussion about the DC bi pole III is being conducted without an energy plan for the province, without full information as to future corridors which will be required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
