<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five questions for the Friends of Upper Fort Garry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/five-questions-for-the-friends-of-upper-fort-garry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/five-questions-for-the-friends-of-upper-fort-garry/</link>
	<description>Dissecting politics, business and the media in Manitoba</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kris Merrells</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/five-questions-for-the-friends-of-upper-fort-garry/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Merrells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I have lived in Winnipeg all my life, and, barring unforeseen circumstances, plan to continue to live here.  I am a huge fan of the city&#039;s history, and have repeatedly stopped at the Upper Fort Garry site to look around and read what&#039;s there, and remind myself of what life was like when the fort was established and inhabited.

However, I do not see why the city should be forced to re-neg on a deal that has been already made with (Crystal Developers?) for the apartment complex.

For the person who says that we are not preserving our history, I would ask how the current parking lot preserves our history.  Plus, they aren&#039;t even tearing down the current site.  It&#039;s being integrated into the development as a park, therefore &quot;preserving&quot; the current historic site.

I am also a proud Winnipegger; I also love history.  Build the apartments.  Don&#039;t bilk us for donations to save a site that is currently a parking lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have lived in Winnipeg all my life, and, barring unforeseen circumstances, plan to continue to live here.  I am a huge fan of the city&#8217;s history, and have repeatedly stopped at the Upper Fort Garry site to look around and read what&#8217;s there, and remind myself of what life was like when the fort was established and inhabited.</p>
<p>However, I do not see why the city should be forced to re-neg on a deal that has been already made with (Crystal Developers?) for the apartment complex.</p>
<p>For the person who says that we are not preserving our history, I would ask how the current parking lot preserves our history.  Plus, they aren&#8217;t even tearing down the current site.  It&#8217;s being integrated into the development as a park, therefore &#8220;preserving&#8221; the current historic site.</p>
<p>I am also a proud Winnipegger; I also love history.  Build the apartments.  Don&#8217;t bilk us for donations to save a site that is currently a parking lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolicyFrog</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/five-questions-for-the-friends-of-upper-fort-garry/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>PolicyFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Sorry Larry, but you&#039;re wrong across the board.

I was born here, and I live here out of choice. If I didn&#039;t want to be here, I&#039;d move. Of course that doesn&#039;t mean I can&#039;t see plenty of areas where we could improve. 

I also have a healthy respect for our city&#039;s heritage. If you read through some of my other posts, you&#039;ll see I&#039;m a big advocate for the Exchange District in particular. However, I recognize we have to strike a balance between the past and the future if we hope to build on the modest progress our city has made in recent years.

I have no problem with building a heritage park to recognize Upper Fort Garry, but I disagree strongly with the Friends&#039; position that such a project can&#039;t co-exist with an apartment complex. To put it bluntly, I think downtown residential development benefits our city far more -- financially, culturally and aesthetically -- than a stand-alone heritage park ever could. Ideally, the two could be developed together, which I think offers the best of both proposals.

As for the Friends website, I&#039;ve seen it and linked to it several times already. As you can see for yourself, there&#039;s absolutely no detail regarding their plans for the park, just a few architectural drawings. Based on the drawings and comments in the media, it seems their plan is based on work done by Heritage Winnipeg a few years ago, As I point out above, the HW plan was costed out at $2.6 million. The Friends haven&#039;t offered any explanation for the massive cost increase.

As for my questions being &quot;immature&quot;, well I guess that&#039;s your opinion. I obviously disagree. Personally, I think it demonstrates immaturity as a city if we can&#039;t question the decisions of our business and community leaders on matters such as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Larry, but you&#8217;re wrong across the board.</p>
<p>I was born here, and I live here out of choice. If I didn&#8217;t want to be here, I&#8217;d move. Of course that doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t see plenty of areas where we could improve. </p>
<p>I also have a healthy respect for our city&#8217;s heritage. If you read through some of my other posts, you&#8217;ll see I&#8217;m a big advocate for the Exchange District in particular. However, I recognize we have to strike a balance between the past and the future if we hope to build on the modest progress our city has made in recent years.</p>
<p>I have no problem with building a heritage park to recognize Upper Fort Garry, but I disagree strongly with the Friends&#8217; position that such a project can&#8217;t co-exist with an apartment complex. To put it bluntly, I think downtown residential development benefits our city far more &#8212; financially, culturally and aesthetically &#8212; than a stand-alone heritage park ever could. Ideally, the two could be developed together, which I think offers the best of both proposals.</p>
<p>As for the Friends website, I&#8217;ve seen it and linked to it several times already. As you can see for yourself, there&#8217;s absolutely no detail regarding their plans for the park, just a few architectural drawings. Based on the drawings and comments in the media, it seems their plan is based on work done by Heritage Winnipeg a few years ago, As I point out above, the HW plan was costed out at $2.6 million. The Friends haven&#8217;t offered any explanation for the massive cost increase.</p>
<p>As for my questions being &#8220;immature&#8221;, well I guess that&#8217;s your opinion. I obviously disagree. Personally, I think it demonstrates immaturity as a city if we can&#8217;t question the decisions of our business and community leaders on matters such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry H</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/five-questions-for-the-friends-of-upper-fort-garry/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-340</guid>
		<description>First of all, I would guess your not a Winnipeger by birth. My second guess is you would rather be somewhere else other then Winnipeg. But those of us that were born here have a very fond attachment to this city and its heritage. I for one believe that our history should be preserved, not only for ourselves, but also future generations. 
The five questions are what I find to be immature in nature. If you took the time to research what you see as a problem, you might learn something of value. I would first suggest you visit the following website to start with and view it all. http://www.upperfortgarry.com/plans_for_upper_fort_garry/
But thats as far as I go. It was your parents responsibility to see to your education, not me. 
I am and always will be a PROUD WINNIPEGER and I love history.
Larry H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I would guess your not a Winnipeger by birth. My second guess is you would rather be somewhere else other then Winnipeg. But those of us that were born here have a very fond attachment to this city and its heritage. I for one believe that our history should be preserved, not only for ourselves, but also future generations.<br />
The five questions are what I find to be immature in nature. If you took the time to research what you see as a problem, you might learn something of value. I would first suggest you visit the following website to start with and view it all. <a href="http://www.upperfortgarry.com/plans_for_upper_fort_garry/" rel="nofollow">http://www.upperfortgarry.com/plans_for_upper_fort_garry/</a><br />
But thats as far as I go. It was your parents responsibility to see to your education, not me.<br />
I am and always will be a PROUD WINNIPEGER and I love history.<br />
Larry H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherenkov</title>
		<link>http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/five-questions-for-the-friends-of-upper-fort-garry/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>cherenkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policyfrog.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Good questions.  &quot;World class&quot; is a catch phrase that resonates with Winnipeggers because of our inferiority complex.  I suspect that your suspicion that it&#039;s just marketing bunk is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions.  &#8220;World class&#8221; is a catch phrase that resonates with Winnipeggers because of our inferiority complex.  I suspect that your suspicion that it&#8217;s just marketing bunk is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
